Source: Chris Casteel/Newsok
WASHINGTON — Two federal appeals courts issued conflicting decisions Tuesday on whether the Affordable Care Act allows Oklahomans and people in 35 other states to receive tax credits for health insurance purchased on federal exchanges.
The high-stakes dispute seems destined for the U.S. Supreme Court, which already has issued major rulings this year and in 2012 on the health care law. The tax subsidy issue threatens the economic framework of the law, which uses tax incentives and penalties to increase the number of insured Americans.
One of the states is Oklahoma, where Attorney General Scott Pruitt has been fighting the Obama administration in federal court in Muskogee.
But the Oklahoma judge has been slow in comparison to ones in Washington, D.C., and in Virginia. Federal district judges in both jurisdictions ruled months ago that tax subsidies were available for policies bought on state exchanges or from the federal exchanges; those decisions were then immediately appealed.
On Tuesday, appeals courts here and in Richmond, Va., split on the matter. The D.C. circuit court ruled 2-1 that the tax subsidies are available only for insurance bought on exchanges established by states. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 3-0 that the law allows subsidies for insurance purchased on state or federal exchanges.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Tuesday that “it’s important for people all across the country to understand that this (D.C. court) ruling does not have any practical impact on their ability to continue to receive tax credits right now.”
The U.S. Justice Department likely would ask the full D.C. circuit court to revisit the case, Earnest said, and the administration feels confident its argument — that Congress intended subsidies for both state and federal exchanges — ultimately would prevail.
“We feel strongly about the sound legal reasoning” of the administration’s case, Earnest said.